CUOCP® Exam Structure & Domains

Exam Focus

The examination emphasizes:

  • Applied decision-making under real constraints

  • Risk-informed judgment

  • Cross-functional coordination

  • Ethical accountability and professional responsibility

This is not a rote knowledge or attendance-based assessment. The examination assumes prior professional experience and evaluates how candidates reason, prioritize, and decide under pressure.

NACUP provides CUOCP® preparation modules to define the professional standard and expectations evaluated on the examination. Completion of modules supports alignment to the standard; certification is awarded based solely on examination performance.

Section 1: Exam Architecture

Assessing applied leadership judgment in utility operations and capital environments

The CUOCP® examination evaluates real-world professional judgment required in regulated, safety-critical utility and capital environments.

Exam Format

  • Secure, third-party proctored examination through Honorlock

  • Computer-based delivery

  • Combination of multiple-choice and scenario-based questions

  • Scenarios reflect operational, capital, safety, risk, regulatory, accountability and leadership decision-making contexts


Section 2: Exam Length & Structure

Exam Length & Timing

  • Total questions: 120

  • Exam duration: 3 hours

Question Structure

  • Scenario-driven questions may include:

    • Operational disruptions

    • Capital project tradeoffs

    • Safety or compliance dilemmas

    • Contractor or workforce issues

    • Budget, schedule, or regulatory pressure

Candidates are evaluated on judgment quality, not speed.


1. Utility Operations Leadership — 30%

This domain assesses leadership judgment in day-to-day utility operations.

Includes evaluation of:

  • Operational decision-making in safety-critical environments

  • Managing reliability, outages, and performance under constraints

  • Workforce leadership, supervision, and accountability

  • Emergency prepardness opertion priorities

  • Balancing operational priorities with regulatory and public expectations

This domain reflects the core leadership responsibilities of utility operations professionals.

2. Capital Program Execution & Oversight — 25%

This domain evaluates oversight and governance of capital programs and projects.

Includes evaluation of:

  • Capital planning and prioritization

  • Project execution oversight (schedule, cost, scope, risk)

  • Contractor and vendor management

  • Governance, controls, and accountability across capital portfolios

Focus is placed on oversight and judgment, not technical design.

3. Risk, Safety, and Regulatory Decision-Making — 20%

This domain measures how candidates assess and manage risk in regulated environments.

Includes evaluation of:

  • Safety leadership and risk mitigation

  • Compliance decision-making

  • Navigating regulatory obligations and audits

  • Responding to incidents, near-misses, or enforcement scenarios

Candidates are evaluated on their ability to protect public safety, infrastructure, and trust.

4. Cross-Functional Coordination & Contractor Oversight — 15%

This domain focuses on leadership across organizational boundaries.

Includes evaluation of:

  • Coordinating engineering, operations, safety, and regulatory functions

  • Managing external contractors and partners

  • Resolving cross-functional conflicts

  • Ensuring alignment and accountability across teams

This reflects the reality that utility leaders rarely operate in silos.

5. Ethics, Accountability, and Professional Judgment — 10%

This domain evaluates ethical leadership and professional responsibility.

Includes evaluation of:

  • Ethical decision-making under pressure

  • Conflict-of-interest awareness

  • Transparency and accountability

  • Upholding professional standards and public trust

This domain reinforces that credibility and integrity are foundational, not optional.

Section 3: Exam Domains & Weightings

Together, these domains reflect the full leadership responsibility held by utility and capital professionals — from daily operations through enterprise-level accountability.

(Percentages may be refined over time to reflect industry evolution.)


Section 4: Scoring & Performance Standards

Scoring Overview

  • The CUOCP® exam is scored using a psychometrically sound methodology

  • Candidates must demonstrate overall competence across domains

  • Passing standards are set to reflect professional readiness, not relative ranking

NACUP does not disclose individual questions, answers, or scoring algorithms to protect exam integrity.

Section 5: What the Exam Is — and Is Not

What the CUOCP® Exam Is

  • An independent, exam-based professional assessment

  • A benchmark of applied leadership readiness in utility operations and capital environments

  • A validation of professional judgment, accountability, and decision-making under pressure

What the CUOCP® Exam Is Not

  • A course-completion or attendance-based credential

  • A memorization-based test

  • A vendor- or employer-specific certification

Preparation resources support readiness; certification is awarded solely through demonstrated performance on the examination.

Section 6: Next Steps

Candidates are encouraged to review:

  • Eligibility Requirements

  • Examination Policies & Procedures

  • Testing & Proctoring Information

Enrollment is available once eligibility is confirmed.

Ready to proceed?
Review eligibility requirements and examination policies before enrollment.

Exam content and structure questions: support@nacup.org

Abstract network graphic representing interconnected infrastructure systems, data-driven decision-making, and system-wide resilience in utility operations.
CUOCP exam structure overview illustrating utility infrastructure systems, power transmission, and network-based decision-making concepts.
CUOCP exam domains outlining utility operations leadership, capital program execution, risk safety and regulation, cross-functional coordination, and ethics and professional judgment.
CUOCP exam framework graphic representing safety, infrastructure reliability, regulatory balance, and professional judgment in utility operations leadership.

“A standardized assessment of applied leadership judgment in utility operations and capital environments.”